I like to think we use a judgment of combination of evidence and players opinions. When Slayer types, "Undeniable evidence"... How is it undeniable? Of course when a player does good or very good at camping they shout out, "hacker!". Like today,
"1/8/2013 15:44:25 : # [Global] -=101st=-Gen.DeadlyOp: AIMBOT! YOU HACKER!!!!
1/8/2013 15:45:06 : # [Global] -=101st=-Gen.DeadlyOp: in the head
1/8/2013 15:45:06 : # [Global] -=101st=-Gen.DeadlyOp: whn i just spawned
1/8/2013 15:45:06 : # [Global] ashogunnamedmarcus: LOL AIMBOT U SPAWNED IN FRONT OF ME
1/8/2013 15:45:36 : # [Global] -[HELLO]-Acashmoney|SL: exactly..."
"1/8/2013 15:57:06 : # [Global] [SNIPER]AlphaWolfKotaCL: LOUSEY HACKERS
1/8/2013 15:57:06 : # [Global] [SNIPER]AlphaWolfKotaCL: !!
1/8/2013 15:57:36 : # [Global] -[HELLO]-Acashmoney|SL: no hackers..
1/8/2013 15:57:36 : # [Global] -[HELLO]-Acashmoney|SL: no need to cry hacker when you die"
If we want to ban hackers, anytime someone calls someone a hacker in the server and I am on, you will be kicked for insulting.
If you think someone is hacking ask a admin to help instead of calling hacker. That might actually help. Using Xfire is recommended to contact admins.
To the Outlaw being unban: There was not enough evidence of any type of hack. This is a final decision in till new evidence is revealed for the player.
**edit in**
As you can see, I am clearly not in a good mood from all this business of calling hackers, "Sorry but some admins are really incompetent." Also of that. We don't unban because oh la de da lets unban people today! This topic is basically a bitch slap against me, beta, and tankboy who unban cause of no proof of hacking. We are doing our jobs as it is required. I understand this is your opinion but what if Outlaw was you and you know you are not hacking but people are accusing you of hacking?