The way the server is going

[Yok_Foo]

I think i've been going crazy on the server, imagining things, or perhaps not.

I saw a couple of players which i knew were noobs but suddenly they had become really good at predicting around corners, their names were "Rilou AK47 fr" and "Cao_Bang_Fr" (sic).

I became suspicious that they had some kind of hacks going on so i asked them if they were hacking? as a reply Rilou started talking cryptic french while he knows english pretty well, after my suspicions grew i confronted him more times and sometimes he didn't write anything while often he arrogantly replied in french, it was obvious his arrogant behaviour only came when i confronted him.

But i lost it, after 2 hours i knew he was hacking, i cussed at him for being an hacker but he didn't react to accusations which speaks for his doings on the server.
I apologise for my bad behaviour on the server...

There are some hackers on the server (EU time), i just know it, but my cussing was and IS inexcusable.

1 hacker is 1 one too many, 2-3 hackers are too much.

After two other hackers "Nür für Dich" and " <^>" talked about hacks on the server in recent weeks/months i've decided to maybe leave HELLO clan if situation doesn't get better.

I think anybody who gets caught of hacking should be banned, doesn't matter who you are because otherwise it tells other hackers that it's OK to hack on Hello allmaps and everything that follows from it.

 

[slayer4041]

that video could have been from spectator mode... when the spectator mode ACTUALLY used to work in bfv.

It says in the youtube video description, "I only ran these hacks because Hello server's spectator mode wasn't working properly."

Even if he was using them simply to spectate, he has possession of hacks. It's like saying, "Oh yea I buy weed all the time because I'm trying to catch the dealers."

 

[slayer4041]

Also, i got word some of you get annoyed by my posts.
Be a man and come say in my face.Instead of keeping saying by my behind.

Just for your information, I have never said anything like that to anyone.


On to other matters.....

This system needs to have more of the peoples say than admins say. All the people say if you hack you should be banned no matter who you are. Most of the admins however, say otherwise for certain people. The general public won't be all biased in one way, because there are a lot of players. Admins, which there are only a few, can be biased EXTREMELY to one player as we have proven earlier in this topic. So it seems like -hacker or not- if you have favor with even one admin, that means you're pretty much safe.

So why don't players have more say in who gets banned than admins?

Now of course, if all the players agree to ban this one person, that doesn't mean he is banned automatically. There has to be solid proof of something against the rules for a ban to be adequate.

As we have proven earlier, solid proof (of hacking) isn't always enough in this system to get you banned which pisses me off.

When you compare how many regular players there are to how many admins there are, well, it's something like a 1:50 ratio. 1 admin for every 50 (or more) players. So, why don't players get any say in these matters? I know some people will say "well that's not true, we give players a lot of say." That's partially true. In other matters, players get a fair amount of say. In these types of matters however, players get about 1% out of 100% of say. Look at all these suggestions and complaints in this topic. They've all been shot down, one by one. Some of them are good, some of them are bad. Regardless, none of them have made a difference.

This topic is going absolutely nowhere as Sheen said. Figure something out so it's not like communism.

 

[FBC]

Dude my gametracker score's went like from 0.2 per minuts then boom 1.8 per mints on Hello allmap so why dont you shut up cause this forum is starting to hurt my eyes

 

[toxic2]

lol blackhawk that dudes face is fucking epic!!! seriously LOL.
it spins!!! LMFAO, love it.