Sugerencias

[silvia]

1-Es una sugerencia.. ....en dos mapas consecutivos los dos mapa duraron 1 minuto cada uno. porque los jugadores de 1 equipo aparecieron antes que el otro sin dar OPCION A DEFENDERSE O ATACAR .Y COMENTO UNO DE ELLOS QUE LO SUFRI .. EL QUIPO CONTRARIO ERAN 3 CONTRA MI . CUANDO APARECI EN EL MAPA YA ESTABAN EN MI MAIN ATACANDOLA LEGALMENTE PORQUE ERA LA ULTIMA BANDERA ... PERO SIN TENER NINGUNA OPCION A DEFENDERME Y ATACAR PASADOS 30 SEGUNDOS DE APARECER EN EL MAPA ENTRO OTRO JUGADOR EN MI EQUIPO 3 CONTRA 2 PERO YA HABIA PERDIDO LA MAIN Y LOS OTROS 30 SEGUNDOS FUERON PARA MORIR SIN PARAR .
TODO LEGAL CIERTO ... PERO MUY SUCIO UN ESTILO SUCIO DE NO SABER NI JUGAR NI PERDER NI GANAR DE GENTE MALA DE LOS QUE LES GUSTA DEJAR CLARO QUE NO SABEN GANAR ... Y QUE LO HAGAN JUGADORES "NORMALES" ESTA MAL PERO CREO NO ESTOY SEGURA DEL TODO SI ES ADMIN UNO DE ELLOS PERO SI LO ES ESTA PEOR
"es mi opinio pero creo que habria que dar tiempo a que el equipo contrario este o por lo menos haya igual de jugadores ,que tenga opcion "
---------------- Y REPITO QUE FUE LEGAL"""""" PERO NO JUSTO ,NI LIMPIO .
2- Creo que si no quieres jugar un mapa por las razones que sean "como por ejemplo no me apetece jugar con x personas y me espero a otro mapa" me cambio al equipo amarillo de espectador... es lo correcto no? si no juegas te pasas al expectador y no molestas el mapa.
cierto personajillo aparte de llamarme loca y demas ( me hace gracia que me llame loca un psicopata ,espero que tenga la habitacion acolchada para que no se golpee la cabeza ).
pues el personajillo este pedia que me fuera en varias ocasiones ...PERO SOLO AMI ..A OTRO JUGADOR TAMBIEN EN EL EQUIPO AMARILLO NO LE LADRO NADA.
Porque a mi si a otro no? tal vez se vino arriba porque jugaba su colegiya
La Pelicula esta ..me la conozco y empieza igual.. "accion---reaccion"

[2021-07-28 19:58:00] Gra$$HoPPer: very lame
[2021-07-28 19:58:46] Gra$$HoPPer: silvia is crazy
[2021-07-28 19:59:00] Gra$$HoPPer: she should just leave
[2021-07-28 19:59:37] Gra$$HoPPer: ruins all the teams every game
[2021-07-28 20:01:33] Gra$$HoPPer: leave if no play
[2021-07-28 20:17:12] Gra$$HoPPer: take silvia with you please

"creo que la regla es asi SI sabes que no vas a jugar el mapa te vas al equipo amarillo de expectador " NO? "es lo que hice "

 

[HeiligWahrheit]

Silvia, I can read that something happend, but please try to translate to english. When I use google translater to see what you're writing, 70% of your message makes no sense as it's not translated properly by google and 10% are heavy insults in german translation...^^ Could you maybe use google for translation to english and fix the wrong translated parts? Then we all can understand, what you're writing

Back to topic: If I got your message right, you also brought in a report about this topic. The Admins will handle it.

 

[IceSkater]

Hello Silvia,

With regard to the issue of bad sportsmanship, this is not against the rules at all. I'm afraid that we can't govern every single aspect of the game. Bad sportsmanship just comes with the territory of online gaming.

In relation to the issue of spectating, you are encouraged to go to spectator mode if you are going to be AFK for a bit or if you want to join but are waiting for the next map. It's completely understandable and quite alright.

Regarding your player complaint, please note what was said to you is not against the rules. However, because of the past history, he will be sent a message. That is as far as that goes at the moment. It should also be said that it takes two to make a conversation, I continue to urge you not to respond to any of his messages.

As you say - action will equal reaction.



Regards,
Ice

 

[silvia]

you maybe use google for translation to english and fix the wrong translated parts?

I tried .
If you do not understand something or doubt, you tell me and I look at it again
I checked it twice and if it is true that it changes some words
The original text is above and this text corrected words to adjust them and removed others so that the meaning does not change
(just by putting one ? or two ¿?, ....... changed the meaning of the phrase)
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

1-In two consecutive maps the two maps lasted 1 minute each.
Because the players of 1 team appeared before the other team without giving OPTION TO DEFEND OR ATTACK.
I describe what happened in 1 of these maps:
I appeared on the map 3 vs 1 (me) and already my base attacking it
(all legally had all the flags and all legal)
After 30 seconds of appearing on the map another player entered my team (3vs2 now) but he no longer had the main, helis.
We were 30 seconds more DYING EXCLUSIVELY, we had no flags or helis or option to defend ourselves, only to die from helis shots.
I REPEAT: EVERYTHING WAS LEGAL
But: It was all very dirty, a dirty style, from people who don't know how to play, from people who don't know how to win, from people who don't know how to lose, from bad people.
That players do that is not right, but that there was (I think it is an admin) an admin watching it and participating is worse.
AND I REPEAT AGAIN: that everything was legal, BUT NOT FAIR
What sense does it make ?, attack the enemy if it still does not appear on the map 3 vs 0
It is my opinion. I think we should give the players time to be on the map and we have a more or less balance and we ALL HAVE A CHOICE
__________________________________________________________
2- the person who does not want to play a map, for whatever reasons, and decides to wait for another map, this person will change to the yellow spectator team.
It's the right thing to do, right?
THAT'S WHAT I DID, SWITCH TO SPECTATOR MODE
The "GRASSOPER ACTION" was this:
[2021-07-28 19:58:00] Gra $$ HoPPer: very lame
[2021-07-28 19:58:46] Gra $$ HoPPer: silvia is crazy
[2021-07-28 19:59:00] Gra $$ HoPPer: she should just leave
[2021-07-28 19:59:37] Gra $$ HoPPer: ruins all the teams every game
[2021-07-28 20:01:33] Gra $$ HoPPer: leave if no play
[2021-07-28 20:17:12] Gra $$ HoPPer: take silvia with you please

(I'm funny that a psychopath calls me crazy)
But he only told me. Another player who was in the yellow team did not call him crazy, he did not ask to leave, he did not ask to be taken away.

Why does he provoke me?
Why doesn't he provoke others?
I did not speak to him at any time, and I support his comments.
I only spoke to him to tell him that what he was saying was going to report. At no time did I speak to him.


The Movie is ... I know it and it starts the same ... "action --- reaction"

 

[silvia]

this is not against the rules at all

But do you agree with me that it is:
play dirty of people who do not know how to play

In relation to the issue of spectating, you are encouraged to go to spectator mode if you are going to be AFK for a bit or if you want to join but are waiting for the next map. It's completely understandable and quite alright.

I thank you for the invitation ..
That was exactly what I did ...
I started the map and I instantly switched to the yellow spectator team.

Regarding your player complaint, please note what was said to you is not against the rules

And do you think what he told me is a good idea?

I continue to urge you not to respond to any of his messages.

The problem is not the person who answers
The problem is the person causing it.
If I don't insult you, you will never insult me
If I insult you, you will logically respond.
The solution is very very easy.

As you say - action will equal reaction.

the reaction will be greater or less never the same

I also tell you ..
"do not offer food to people who throw away the pieces of bread"

_________________________________________________________________________

You know that I respect your work as an admin and that it is difficult to tell you many times in the past, yours and that of the other admins.
But I do not understand your position of anything goes.

 

[silvia]

If you don't understand something, tell me.
When I can I will answer it the day after tomorrow, I get the vaccine and I have the body ironed

 

[silvia]

is it better understood ??

 

[IceSkater]

But do you agree with me that it is:
play dirty of people who do not know how to play

I do agree. However, again, it's not against the rules unfortunately.

I thank you for the invitation ..
That was exactly what I did ...
I started the map and I instantly switched to the yellow spectator team.

Perfect!

The problem is not the person who answers
The problem is the person causing it.
If I don't insult you, you will never insult me
If I insult you, you will logically respond.
The solution is very very easy.

Allow those who wish ill will to dig their own graves at their own behest. If grass wishes to follow suit in his old ways, then it will happen.

the reaction will be greater or less never the same

I also tell you ..
"do not offer food to people who throw away the pieces of bread"

_________________________________________________________________________

You know that I respect your work as an admin and that it is difficult to tell you many times in the past, yours and that of the other admins.
But I do not understand your position of anything goes.

He has improved ten fold since his last time with us and (again) he was let back because of his "improved" behavior. He hasn't broken any rules and he hasn't actually "verbally" assaulted you.

He passed some crude remarks, that didn't break the rules. We don't punish for that, but as I said - he will be spoken to and reminded about the return of a hammer.

My position of "anything goes" isn't quite accurate. The main concern that you have in all of this is that I let certain player(s) back that you don't like and for good reason. However, my actual position is trying to be unbiased as possible. You & I have always had open communication and there were times I said things wouldn't happen, but they did because circumstances change. I can't maintain a negative outlook the whole time and keep just you happy by ridding the server of those that you don't like...or even at one stage I didn't like.

These people have been banned (a few) times in the past. For good reason, but they are back for equally good reason - people change and most of the time it is for the better (or rather a massive improvement on what they once were).

Please also note that I don't just remove "permanent" bans as I wish. I speak to those that are more present than I currently am in-game. The admins and I will always allow people to appeal their bans. If they are not deemed a threat to the server's well being, or if there are no other immediate concerns, they may be allowed back based upon their behavior. Which is currently the case.

There is a plethora of things that can go wrong when a "permanently" banned player is un-banned, but it is done based upon a consensus done by a group of level minded and unbiased people. These people are also players on the server, not just admins and it's why they are here.

If things deteriorate with this player, we of course will take action again.



There is also the age old question, which I'm sure a few people reading this might ask, and that is:

How much damage must be done before they take action?

The answer to this question is not very straightforward. I personally am gambling, I'm trusting people who, in the past didn't give me reason too. I'm choosing to trust them now because I've had my own experiences that have caused a change of view. If this trust ends up being misplaced, my conscience is clear and I tried fully and openly this time.



I hope this somewhat clarifies things Silvia, again, I can't keep everyone happy (kinda hating saying that now) but it's the truth. 99 Good things can be done, but that 1 bad thing will be the hot topic of debate.



Regards,
Ice

 

[silvia]

La principal preocupación que tienes en todo esto es que dejo regresar a ciertos jugadores que no te gustan y por una buena razón

True . And I told you. I don't want them to play for many reasons, many that you know, and others that I could not demonstrate and others that I could not tell you. My opinion is not valid ... but my opinion is that neither of them play. I'm not going to lie to you

I hope this somewhat clarifies things Silvia

Do you remember that I told you on several occasions ...
I do not agree with you but I understand your answer.
This is one of them ..
Now with your deeper explanation. I understand you.
(What you know I do not share is that those two characters return.)
I appreciate that you explained it to me because now I understand you a little more ..
Regarding grass. People don't treat me like grass the other day, most of the players treat me normally.
and I tell you, I just played with grass and against grass ... and today grass behaved normal.
with that aptitude I have no problem with him.
And I thank you for explaining it to me in this way
THANK YOU "ICE"