- Local time
- 3:40 AM
- Joined
- Feb 24, 2011
- Messages
- 1,555
- Reaction score
- 39
- Age
- 31
- Location
- Reading, England
- Real Name
- Ryan
Hey,
You're right, your name wasn't necessarily offensive. Childish, immature...sure, but that's not something we deal with.
Considering it wasn't offensive, and we removed the rules regarding sexual chat/names years ago, as per this rather old topic, your ban has been removed for now.
The problem is likely that we don't explicitly state that names like this are allowed in our rules, and therefore they can be seen as offensive and be dealt with. However, until our policy on sexual language changes, you are welcome to use the name if you must...
Bear in mind though that this rule can change at any time, and specifics regarding it are likely to change soon.
If there something you'd like to say? If you think there's a problem then let us know, we can't read minds and I'm not much of a fan of cryptic messages from people who seem to think there's an issue but are not willing to just tell us.
No, you probably shouldn't have been banned. No, we don't have any specific rules on sexual but non-offensive language. Yes, it was a pointless name you had no need to use.
I've also no doubt there's some ulterior motive behind the choice too, based on your claims of "censorship" when a thread derails into arguments/pointless comments and so it gets locked, as well as your choice to edit all your reports to remove their content it seems you have bone to pick with us.
Maybe I'm wrong though and you just felt that name was a smart choice and you had other reasons for editing all your reports in which case I apologise...
Regards,
SucceededKiller
You're right, your name wasn't necessarily offensive. Childish, immature...sure, but that's not something we deal with.
Considering it wasn't offensive, and we removed the rules regarding sexual chat/names years ago, as per this rather old topic, your ban has been removed for now.
The problem is likely that we don't explicitly state that names like this are allowed in our rules, and therefore they can be seen as offensive and be dealt with. However, until our policy on sexual language changes, you are welcome to use the name if you must...
Bear in mind though that this rule can change at any time, and specifics regarding it are likely to change soon.
Falschfahrer said:Is this the way Hello runs server?
If there something you'd like to say? If you think there's a problem then let us know, we can't read minds and I'm not much of a fan of cryptic messages from people who seem to think there's an issue but are not willing to just tell us.
No, you probably shouldn't have been banned. No, we don't have any specific rules on sexual but non-offensive language. Yes, it was a pointless name you had no need to use.
I've also no doubt there's some ulterior motive behind the choice too, based on your claims of "censorship" when a thread derails into arguments/pointless comments and so it gets locked, as well as your choice to edit all your reports to remove their content it seems you have bone to pick with us.
Maybe I'm wrong though and you just felt that name was a smart choice and you had other reasons for editing all your reports in which case I apologise...
Regards,
SucceededKiller