Discussion = KiK?

[air_tresor_bln]

Hello dear forum
I is not fun to play Battlefield Vietnam, when even admins, players from the game ban just because you argue with them.

THIS COULD JUST NOT BE !!!

The following situation took place just,

An admin has warned me that I should not attack the main base if it is not the last flag. I have seen from miles a MUTT the shot me out of the Main Base has fired back, I wanted to capture a flag in the Main Base near where I called MUTT has fired. After I had warned the Admin I asked why?

Answer: Because I attacked the Main Base, which is this shit?

I can understand it if infantry firing at me from the Main Base, but when I shoot at a MUTT then I surely can shoot back from a long distance.

We have discussed 5min where I have but then said it ended for me this discussion is thrown, THE ADMIN ME OUT OF PLAY.

WHAT SHOULD THIS FUCK? Can not even discuss with the admin (WITHOUT him zubeleidigen) zuwerden then thrown out of the game?

I want to be excluded that these admins from across the BFV what is this the Admin from the game throws me just because I have raised him to the warning ????

This is embarrassing and ridiculous Admin and takes away the fun on this game, and casts a large shadow on the really good admins like for Canada.

You can you read through this dialogue and see the admin of this is out of place and his favorite player he never warn or ban and then the players are there often kill him and he to warn them already in a discussion KIKT without him !!! !

thank you for reading,

and please throw this out Admin!

 

[Capt. Canada]

Tresor,

I am the one who kicked you. I spent the round spectating. You fired on US main which is illegal even if they are shooting at you. At Hastings, if you fly near NVA main, they will shoot at you with SA-7, but that does not mean you can shoot at them. The same applies at Khe Sahn. If you are near enough to their main, they are going to shoot at you. It's really that simple. Otherwise, people will attack mains endlessly with the justification, "well, they shot at me." At that point, the rule against main rape becomes irrelevant. The warning means exactly that, and I expected you to understand the nature of the warning.

The reason for the kick was the argument that followed, mostly because I do not feel that I want to argue with every player who disagrees with a warning, a kill, or a kick.

If you feel that I acted rashly, then I apologise. However, please do not think that it was an exclusive enforcement against you for any reason because it was not. I have no disdain for any players and try to be fair in my judgment.