• Need to report a player? Or a server issue? Or just need help? Use our helpdesk! Click here and open a ticket for faster response times!

Main Bases in BFV

A

Anonymous

Guest
In BF1942 on invasion maps, the ivading teams main base was un captureable, because the goal of the maps were to invade and eliminate the other team, not for the team being invaded to immeadiatly know of the invasion and invade the invading teams only base, and capturing it, thus giving the invading no chance for anything except the chance to be unrelentlessly raped. In BfV you see these cheap players who sit next to an ammo box droping 0 sectimebombst. And in BF1942 you rarely saw the other team raping the uncaptueable main base because there was no point in it cbecause you could not take the main providing a much fairer chance for th invading team, as well as more fun.
Byrds proposal: making the mains ithe following maps uncapturable/ exstrememly difficult to capture (set the time to capture the base to like 10 hMurs or something. In additon to that spreading out the soldier spawns to cover a broader area, thus nmaking hardto rape periois.
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
Maps to make mains uncapturable
-Ia Drang Valley: US airbase
-Irving: Us Airbase
-Cedar Falls Us Airbase
-Ho-chi-mihn trail: US Main Base
-Fall of Saigon: NVA Main Base
-Quang Tri 1968: NVA Main Base
-Quang Tri 1972: ARVN main Base
-Recaliming Hue: ARVN main Base
-Cambodian Incursion: VC main base
-Lang Vei- Nva main (spread Us main solider spawns in main to give quicker acces to helis and more wide pread spawn to reduce rape
effectiveness)
***Khe Sahn:double ltime it takes to capture khe sahn, spread us solider spawns out and hadd a few near helis)
 

CommandoBeta

Grand Master
REGISTERED
Local time
10:52 AM
Joined
Sep 27, 2010
Messages
4,339
Reaction score
0
Age
29
Location
the Netherlands
SgtSurfinByrd said:
Maps to make mains uncapturable
-Ia Drang Valley: US airbase
-Irving: Us Airbase
-Cedar Falls Us Airbase
-Ho-chi-mihn trail: US Main Base
-Fall of Saigon: NVA Main Base
-Quang Tri 1968: NVA Main Base
-Quang Tri 1972: ARVN main Base
-Recaliming Hue: ARVN main Base
-Cambodian Incursion: VC main base
-Lang Vei- Nva main (spread Us main solider spawns in main to give quicker acces to helis and more wide pread spawn to reduce rape
effectiveness)
***Khe Sahn:double ltime it takes to capture khe sahn, spread us solider spawns out and hadd a few near helis)

Many people like taking main bases, with tunnels or in secret missions. It also makes the game interesting when the US doesnt have a mainbase. I think they should remain capturable.
Also replacing the ZSU with a nancy would mean that after 20 seconds the US air defence would be gone because someone would use it as transport.
 

MaximumD2

Forum Rookie
REGISTERED
Local time
2:52 AM
Joined
Mar 5, 2011
Messages
244
Reaction score
0
I would hope this for an event. Because I play for fun, not for realism. I like it the way it is.
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
Its not ment to make it more realistic, its just no fun getting base raped and having the oppenent take your only base before you get a chance to do anything.
 

N00BASAURUS REX

Just Joined
REGISTERED
Local time
8:52 AM
Joined
Apr 22, 2011
Messages
0
Reaction score
0
Location
Tokyo, China
SgtSurfinByrd said:
Maps to make mains uncapturable
-Ia Drang Valley: US airbase
-Irving: Us Airbase
-Cedar Falls Us Airbase
-Ho-chi-mihn trail: US Main Base
-Fall of Saigon: NVA Main Base
-Quang Tri 1968: NVA Main Base
-Quang Tri 1972: ARVN main Base
-Recaliming Hue: ARVN main Base
-Cambodian Incursion: VC main base
-Lang Vei- Nva main (spread Us main solider spawns in main to give quicker acces to helis and more wide pread spawn to reduce rape
effectiveness)
***Khe Sahn:double ltime it takes to capture khe sahn, spread us solider spawns out and hadd a few near helis)

Dumb idea. Ruins the game. Its good as everyone usually switches sides and so taking main stops this.
 

Player_0

Just Joined
REGISTERED
Local time
10:52 AM
Joined
Nov 22, 2010
Messages
0
Reaction score
0
Location
pink houses
Real Name
Ben Dover
N00BASAURUS REX said:
Dumb idea. Ruins the game. Its good as everyone usually switches sides and so taking main stops this.
The fact you don't like it doesn't make it dumb.
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
Its captureing all the enemy bases is the the goal for invading teams on invasion maps. And my poroposal was making the invading teams main, impossible or more difficult to capture. In Bf1942 they had it this was on ivasion maps, acually they did iit on most maps, thwit this the amount of times either team was victoriuos was about around 1:1, alouth this might cause the maps to longer, tickets dropped faster in bf1942, when the invading team control more than 50% of the bases, than in bfv.
N00BASAURUS REX said:
Dumb idea. Ruins the game. Its good as everyone usually switches sides and so taking main stops this.
Taking the main does not stop team switching. People can teamswitch when they want to if they want to be on the Nva they can be, anyone has just as much a right as your do to be on the team they like. Not everyone hates team switchers either, and everyone team switches. It goes for everyone, if you were on a team that you didnt want to be on, you would try team switching, so dont b**** about team switchers when everyone does it.
-Anyway back to the ontopic dicussion In bf1942 cuncaptureable mains where great, they gave both teams an equal, ior near equal chance at winning.
 

CommandoBeta

Grand Master
REGISTERED
Local time
10:52 AM
Joined
Sep 27, 2010
Messages
4,339
Reaction score
0
Age
29
Location
the Netherlands
SgtSurfinByrd said:
Its captureing all the enemy bases is the the goal for invading teams on invasion maps. And my poroposal was making the invading teams main, impossible or more difficult to capture. In Bf1942 they had it this was on ivasion maps, acually they did iit on most maps, thwit this the amount of times either team was victoriuos was about around 1:1, alouth this might cause the maps to longer, tickets dropped faster in bf1942, when the invading team control more than 50% of the bases, than in bfv.
N00BASAURUS REX said:
Dumb idea. Ruins the game. Its good as everyone usually switches sides and so taking main stops this.
Taking the main does not stop team switching. People can teamswitch when they want to if they want to be on the Nva they can be, anyone has just as much a right as your do to be on the team they like. Not everyone hates team switchers either, and everyone team switches. It goes for everyone, if you were on a team that you didnt want to be on, you would try team switching, so dont b**** about team switchers when everyone does it.
-Anyway back to the ontopic dicussion In bf1942 cuncaptureable mains where great, they gave both teams an equal, ior near equal chance at winning.

People dont really care about winning as long as it doesnt end in a big rape. Also now it is 50/50 winning I think, and it is very easy for US to defend their main, all they need is a good huey or f4 pilot , or just someone who stays at main to guard it.
 
Back
Top