Hacking

[Anonymous]

Byrd haas heard from a few admins that hacking is not allowed.... if it is can you put it up under the rules section. Byrd thinks alot of people think it is allowed because it is not posted there.

 

[Anonymous]

also if glitching is not allowed depending on the glitch can you also post that under the rules section?

 

[Alphascout]

HACKING is NOT allowed period no matter what it is a rule

 

[Anonymous]

Byrd is aware of that, but it is not posted as one of the server rules on the server. Byrd is asking if they can put it up on the server under rules,

 

[Alphascout]

good idea

admin?

 

[RyanCooper]

Yeah good idea.. Tedde?

 

[Tedde]

I think we all know the whole "hacking" discussion that we got on all servers in bfv. On all forums, on xfire, etc etc. Idk if im the only one more tired of that discussion then of people actually hacking but one thing im sure about, if we put up "no hacking" in our rules on the server announcement. I am almost certain that more people will start discussing it and acuse more players for hacking. Hacking is not allowed on our server, if you see a player hacking you report him on the forum. The announcment says: If a player breaks the rules report him at helloclan.eu/forum. The positive side of this is that players would see that their not allowed to hack, and then maybe prevent them from using hacks? But i think that the negative side brings a dark cloud over the positive one. What do you guys think about what i just said? ( sorry if it sounds long shotted its midnight and im studying for national end exam tomorrow) / Ted

 

[Anonymous]

Byrd see's your point. But byrds point is that many players do think hacking is allowed, therefore they hack or think hacking is allowed. If it was posted under "*RULES" on the server hopefully some people would stop hacking or go somewhere where hacking is allowed. Although, like helloclan13 said, It might make people call others hackers more often, however hackers are ussaully noticed and get called out anyway.

 

[Zero]

which brings up the hole topic about how you need spectators enabled in order to properly record hackers.

 

[Kurk]

OR we could turn BFV 1.2 into BF1942 1.6!!!!

 

[Tedde]

exactly byrd, and yes zero idk why it dont work... its enabled. Will probably do after the reinstall of the server

 

[Travco]

I don't think its required to have the server constantly repeat "no hacking". I mean, its sort of assumable, not to mention if you start hacking, admins are going to tell you if its first offense to just stop. Also, because we have our website repeating there already anyone un-sure SHOULD just check here. If we have more incidences with people saying "I didn't know", then we should just post all the rules right there in-server.

 

[Anonymous]

Still byrd thinks you should post it to reinforce the rules. Byrd, just yesterday infact, had people admit they were hacking and byrd told it was against the rules, they replied "no its not". So, byrd said yes it is ask any admin.

 

[CommandoBeta]

You should post who it was on player complaints so something can be done about them..

 

[Anonymous]

1.6... byrd dont think he has version 1.6 maybe that wouldnt be a good idea, byrd reaaly thinks they should post it under rules bucause byrd does not think it world require much work

 

[CommandoBeta]

The newest version of battlefield 1942 is 1.61?

 

[Kurk]

Newest version of Bf1942 is 1.61b and Bfv is 1.21.1.