A
Anonymous
Guest
For me one of the mosr dissapointing things was BFVs M14, it was too innaccurate, maybe to make it fairer... butthe us really did have the better weapons. Amnd the NVA/VC have the MAT-49, not as good long range but still fully automatic.
BFV's M14
Semi-Automatic
10 Round Clip
The standard Issue M14 in veitnam:
Fully-Automatic: 700-750RPM
20 Round Clip
This might give the US an unfair advantage. However, the NVA/Vietcong have SA-7 Caltrophs, ZSU, BTR, and easily moveable and hard to find tunnels. The M14 is essentially a more accurate AK-47. THis might increase the amount of law noobs,or it could the excact oopposite, Why use the slow firing law when you have a fully automatic rifle. Or engineers could be equipped with full auto m14s.
What is byrd suggesting?If possible Hello Upgrade the m14 and Aat least give it a 20 round clip, and if possibly make at least the engineers m14 ful;l auto like the standard m14.
I have known this since i started playing but for those who dont believe me watch this: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DQ8pKd2Hn28
BFV's M14
Semi-Automatic
10 Round Clip
The standard Issue M14 in veitnam:
Fully-Automatic: 700-750RPM
20 Round Clip
This might give the US an unfair advantage. However, the NVA/Vietcong have SA-7 Caltrophs, ZSU, BTR, and easily moveable and hard to find tunnels. The M14 is essentially a more accurate AK-47. THis might increase the amount of law noobs,or it could the excact oopposite, Why use the slow firing law when you have a fully automatic rifle. Or engineers could be equipped with full auto m14s.
What is byrd suggesting?If possible Hello Upgrade the m14 and Aat least give it a 20 round clip, and if possibly make at least the engineers m14 ful;l auto like the standard m14.
I have known this since i started playing but for those who dont believe me watch this: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DQ8pKd2Hn28